Thanks Vinod for the hints. I have updated the both patches aligning with latest codes, and added more unit tests. The building results look reasonable. Thanks anyone that would give them more review and I would update in timely manner.
Regards, Kai -----Original Message----- From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli [mailto:vino...@hortonworks.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:31 AM To: Zheng, Kai Cc: mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Hadoop Common; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: 2.7 status Kai, please ping the reviewers that were already looking at your patches before. If the patches go in by end of this week, we can include them. Thanks, +Vinod On Mar 2, 2015, at 7:04 PM, Zheng, Kai <kai.zh...@intel.com> wrote: > Is it interested to get the following issues in the release ? Thanks ! > > HADOOP-10670 > HADOOP-10671 > > Regards, > Kai > > -----Original Message----- > From: Yongjun Zhang [mailto:yzh...@cloudera.com] > Sent: Monday, March 02, 2015 4:46 AM > To: hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org > Cc: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli; Hadoop Common; > mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org; yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org > Subject: Re: 2.7 status > > Hi, > > Thanks for working on 2.7 release. > > Currently the fallback from KerberosAuthenticator to PseudoAuthenticator is > enabled by default in a hardcoded way. HAOOP-10895 changes the default and > requires applications (such as oozie) to set a config property or call an API > to enable the fallback. > > This jira has been reviewed, and "almost" ready to get in. However, there is > a concern that we have to change the relevant applications. Please see my > comment here: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10895?focusedCommentId=14 > 321823&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-ta > bpanel#comment-14321823 > > Any of your comments will be highly appreciated. This jira was postponed from > 2.6. I think it should be no problem to skip 2.7. But your comments would > help us to decide what to do with this jira for future releases. > > Thanks. > > --Yongjun > > > On Sun, Mar 1, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Arun Murthy <a...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > >> Sounds good, thanks for the help Vinod! >> >> Arun >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2015 11:43 AM >> To: Hadoop Common; Jason Lowe; Arun Murthy >> Subject: Re: 2.7 status >> >> Agreed. How about we roll an RC end of this week? As a Java 7+ >> release with features, patches that already got in? >> >> Here's a filter tracking blocker tickets - >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=12330598. Nine open now. >> >> +Arun >> Arun, I'd like to help get 2.7 out without further delay. Do you mind >> me taking over release duties? >> >> Thanks, >> +Vinod >> ________________________________________ >> From: Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 8:11 AM >> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org >> Subject: Re: 2.7 status >> >> I'd like to see a 2.7 release sooner than later. It has been almost >> 3 months since Hadoop 2.6 was released, and there have already been >> 634 JIRAs committed to 2.7. That's a lot of changes waiting for an official >> release. >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20in%20%28hadoop%2 >> C >> hdfs%2Cyarn%2Cmapreduce%29%20AND%20fixversion%3D2.7.0%20AND%20resolut >> i >> on%3DFixed >> Jason >> >> From: Sangjin Lee <sj...@apache.org> >> To: "common-...@hadoop.apache.org" <common-...@hadoop.apache.org> >> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2015 1:30 PM >> Subject: 2.7 status >> >> Folks, >> >> What is the current status of the 2.7 release? I know initially it >> started out as a "java-7" only release, but looking at the JIRAs that >> is very much not the case. >> >> Do we have a certain timeframe for 2.7 or is it time to discuss it? >> >> Thanks, >> Sangjin >> >>
