Hey Akira, could you target the issues to 2.7.1? Thanks, - Tsuyoshi
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: > +0 (non-binding) > > - Downloaded source > - Built from source > - Ran a pseudo-distributed cluster > - Read documents downloaded from binary tarball > - Looked Web UIs > > I found several issues to be fixed. > > - HDFS-8149: The footer of Web UI "Hadoop, 2014" is old > > I'm thinking this is a regression from Hadoop 2.6.0. > > - HADOOP-11835: "hadoop version" outputs "Subversion Unknown -r Unknown" > (Also, there are some "Unknown" version in Web UI) > - HADOOP-11836: The content of index.html should be updated for 2.7.0. > > I'm thinking this two issues are not blocker. > > Regards, > Akira > > > On 4/15/15 11:05, Chris Nauroth wrote: >> >> +1 (binding) >> >> - Downloaded source tarball and verified signature and checksum. >> - Built from source, including native code on Linux and Windows. >> - Ran a 3-node unsecured cluster. >> - Tested various HDFS and YARN commands, including sample MapReduce jobs. >> - Confirmed that SecondaryNameNode can take a checkpoint. >> - HADOOP-9629: Tested integration with Azure storage as an alternative >> FileSystem. >> - HADOOP-11394/11395/11396: Built site docs and confirmed presence of >> these fixes in the documentation for Hadoop Compatible File Systems. >> - HDFS-7604: Confirmed presence of DataNode volume failure reporting in >> web UI and metrics. >> - HDFS-7879: Ran nm -g libhdfs.so and dumpbin /exports hdfs.dll to confirm >> export of public API symbols in libhdfs. >> >> Allen mentioned HDFS-8132, which reported a problem using JCarder on the >> build. Brahma, Todd and I have determined that root cause is >> incompatibility of the JCarder build with Java 7 classes. (2.7.0 is our >> first release compiling as Java 7.) This is not a problem that needs to >> hold up the release. >> >> Vinod, thank you for putting together the release. >> >> >> Chris Nauroth >> Hortonworks >> http://hortonworks.com/ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 4/15/15, 7:07 AM, "Mit Desai" <mitde...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non-binding) >>> >>> - Downloaded and built the source. >>> - Deployed to a local cluster and ran sample jobls like sleepJob and >>> Wordcount. >>> - Verified Signatures >>> - Verified the RM UI for correctness. >>> >>> Thanks Vinod for taking the time and effort to drive this release. >>> >>> >>> -Mit Desai >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, April 15, 2015 8:03 AM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>> <vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Tx Pat. This is really interesting news! >>> >>> +Vinod >>> >>> On Apr 14, 2015, at 11:18 PM, Pat White <patwh...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 non-binding >>>> Ran a performance comparison of 2.6.0 Latest with 2.7.0 RC, looks good, >>>> no regressions observed, most metrics are well within 5% tolerance >>>> (dfsio, sort, amrestart, gmv3) and some tests (scan, amscale, >>>> compression, shuffle) appear to have improvements. >>>> >>>> Disclaimer, please note a JDK difference, 2.6.0 ran with jdk1.7 while >>>> 2.7.0 had jdk1.8, so some of the improvement may be from Java 1.8.0, >>>> that said, the 2.7.0 benchmarks compare well against current 2.6.0. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> patw >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >>>> <vino...@apache.org> >>>> To: common-...@hadoop.apache.org; hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org; >>>> yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org; mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org >>>> Cc: vino...@apache.org >>>> Sent: Friday, April 10, 2015 6:44 PM >>>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.7.0 RC0 >>>> Hi all, >>>> I've created a release candidate RC0 for Apache Hadoop 2.7.0. >>>> The RC is available at: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~vinodkv/hadoop-2.7.0-RC0/ >>>> The RC tag in git is: release-2.7.0-RC0 >>>> The maven artifacts are available via repository.apache.org >>>> >>>> athttps://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1017 >>>> / >>>> As discussed before - This release will only work with JDK 1.7 and >>>> above - I¹d like to use this as a starting release for 2.7.x [1], >>>> depending onhow it goes, get it stabilized and potentially use a 2.7.1 >>>> in a fewweeks as the stable release. >>>> Please try the release and vote; the vote will run for the usual 5 days. >>>> Thanks, Vinod >>>> [1]: A 2.7.1 release to follow up >>>> 2.7.0http://markmail.org/thread/zwzze6cqqgwq4rmw >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
