Thanks for testing Shane! Given that the Docker work is experimental
(YARN-6622 will fully document this), I think we're okay shipping with some
known issues.

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 8:50 AM, Shane Kumpf <shane.kumpf.apa...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for putting this together. I was able to build the RC, setup a
> pseudo distributed cluster, and run pi and dshell tests.
>
> There is an outstanding issue in YARN that impacts obtaining the network
> details and signal handling when running with the Docker container runtime.
> These will be addressed in YARN-5670. I'm not sure this is a blocker, as
> docker containers can still be run, but with degraded functionality. I'm +1
> if others feel this isn't a blocker.
>
> Thanks,
> -Shane
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for taking a look Steve,
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 4:59 AM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > On 30 Jun 2017, at 03:40, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > As always, thanks to the many, many contributors who helped with this
>> > release! I've prepared an RC0 for 3.0.0-alpha4:
>> >
>> > http://home.apache.org/~wang/3.0.0-alpha4-RC0/
>> >
>> >
>> > whats the git commit ID? or signed tag?
>> >
>>
>> I'd already pushed a signed tag per the HowToRelease instructions, LMK if
>> it's not right.
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > The standard 5-day vote would run until midnight on Tuesday, July 4th.
>> > Given that July 4th is a holiday in the US, I expect this vote might
>> have
>> > to be extended, but I'd like to close the vote relatively soon after.
>> >
>> > I've done my traditional testing of a pseudo-distributed cluster with a
>> > single task pi job, which was successful.
>> >
>> > Normally my testing would end there, but I'm slightly more confident
>> this
>> > time. At Cloudera, we've successfully packaged and deployed a snapshot
>> from
>> > a few days ago, and run basic smoke tests. Some bugs found from this
>> > include HDFS-11956, which fixes backwards compat with Hadoop 2 clients,
>> and
>> > the revert of HDFS-11696, which broke NN QJM HA setup.
>> >
>> > Vijay is working on a test run with a fuller test suite (the results of
>> > which we can hopefully post soon).
>> >
>> > My +1 to start,
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Andrew
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > I haven't tested with this alpha, but spark 2.2+ can't read files on
>> > Azure: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14598
>> >
>> > Cause: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-14383
>> >
>> > I can see how to do a test we can put into hadoop-common (for
>> trunk/2.9);
>> > if the bug exists in this RC then I think we'll need to revert the
>> > HADOOP-14598 patch for now & then work on a fix
>> >
>> > Sorry —only discovered it this week...an unexpected combination of
>> > features which only become visible when you take the latest bits of two
>> > projects and then run some blobstore tests downstream (
>> https://github.com/
>> > hortonworks-spark/cloud-integration/tree/master/cloud-examples/)
>> >
>> > Ick, I somehow didn't see this blocker on the release dashboard for
>> alpha4, but seems like it's targeted now.
>>
>> If it only affects WASB, then I think we can get by without it for the
>> alpha, fix it in beta1. WDYT?
>>
>> Best,
>> Andrew
>>
>
>

Reply via email to