For some reason, I can't build the source.

Got this when running "mvn install -U" inside directory
"hadoop-maven-plugins":

[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process
(default) on project hadoop-maven-plugins: Execution default of goal
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5:process failed:
Plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:1.5 or one of
its dependencies could not be resolved: Failed to collect dependencies at
org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-remote-resources-plugin:jar:1.5 ->
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-build-tools:jar:3.0.0-alpha4: Failed to read
artifact descriptor for
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-build-tools:jar:3.0.0-alpha4: Failure to find
org.apache.hadoop:hadoop-main:pom:3.0.0-alpha4 in
https://repo.maven.apache.org/maven2 was cached in the local repository,
resolution will not be reattempted until the update interval of central has
elapsed or updates are forced -> [Help 1]


On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 7:40 PM, Andrew Wang <andrew.w...@cloudera.com>
wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> As always, thanks to the many, many contributors who helped with this
> release! I've prepared an RC0 for 3.0.0-alpha4:
>
> http://home.apache.org/~wang/3.0.0-alpha4-RC0/
>
> The standard 5-day vote would run until midnight on Tuesday, July 4th.
> Given that July 4th is a holiday in the US, I expect this vote might have
> to be extended, but I'd like to close the vote relatively soon after.
>
> I've done my traditional testing of a pseudo-distributed cluster with a
> single task pi job, which was successful.
>
> Normally my testing would end there, but I'm slightly more confident this
> time. At Cloudera, we've successfully packaged and deployed a snapshot from
> a few days ago, and run basic smoke tests. Some bugs found from this
> include HDFS-11956, which fixes backwards compat with Hadoop 2 clients, and
> the revert of HDFS-11696, which broke NN QJM HA setup.
>
> Vijay is working on a test run with a fuller test suite (the results of
> which we can hopefully post soon).
>
> My +1 to start,
>
> Best,
> Andrew
>



-- 
John

Reply via email to