[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14682126#comment-14682126 ]
Jing Zhao commented on HDFS-8805: --------------------------------- Thanks for updating the patch, [~brahmareddy]. +1 for the 004 patch. I will commit it shortly. > Archival Storage: getStoragePolicy should not need superuser privilege > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-8805 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: balancer & mover, namenode > Reporter: Hui Zheng > Assignee: Brahma Reddy Battula > Fix For: 2.6.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-8805-002.patch, HDFS-8805-003.patch, > HDFS-8805-004.patch, HDFS-8805.patch > > > The result of getStoragePolicy command is always 'unspecified' even we has > set a StoragePolicy on a directory.But the real placement of blocks is > correct. > The result of fsck is not correct either. > {code} > $ hdfs storagepolicies -setStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold -policy COLD > Set storage policy COLD on /tmp/cold > $ hdfs storagepolicies -getStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold > The storage policy of /tmp/cold is unspecified > $ hdfs fsck -storagepolicies /tmp/cold > Blocks NOT satisfying the specified storage policy: > Storage Policy Specified Storage Policy # of blocks > % of blocks > ARCHIVE:4(COLD) HOT 5 > 55.5556% > ARCHIVE:3(COLD) HOT 4 > 44.4444% > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)