[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14693349#comment-14693349 ]
Hudson commented on HDFS-8805: ------------------------------ FAILURE: Integrated in Hadoop-Yarn-trunk #1015 (See [https://builds.apache.org/job/Hadoop-Yarn-trunk/1015/]) HDFS-8805. Archival Storage: getStoragePolicy should not need superuser privilege. Contributed by Brahma Reddy Battula. (jing9: rev 1fc3c779a422bafdb86ad1a5b2349802dda1cb62) * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirAppendOp.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/CHANGES.txt * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirWriteFileOp.java * hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/namenode/FSDirStatAndListingOp.java > Archival Storage: getStoragePolicy should not need superuser privilege > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-8805 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-8805 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Components: balancer & mover, namenode > Reporter: Hui Zheng > Assignee: Brahma Reddy Battula > Fix For: 2.8.0 > > Attachments: HDFS-8805-002.patch, HDFS-8805-003.patch, > HDFS-8805-004.patch, HDFS-8805.patch > > > The result of getStoragePolicy command is always 'unspecified' even we has > set a StoragePolicy on a directory.But the real placement of blocks is > correct. > The result of fsck is not correct either. > {code} > $ hdfs storagepolicies -setStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold -policy COLD > Set storage policy COLD on /tmp/cold > $ hdfs storagepolicies -getStoragePolicy -path /tmp/cold > The storage policy of /tmp/cold is unspecified > $ hdfs fsck -storagepolicies /tmp/cold > Blocks NOT satisfying the specified storage policy: > Storage Policy Specified Storage Policy # of blocks > % of blocks > ARCHIVE:4(COLD) HOT 5 > 55.5556% > ARCHIVE:3(COLD) HOT 4 > 44.4444% > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)