[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14901080#comment-14901080 ]
Zhe Zhang commented on HDFS-9040: --------------------------------- bq. but we dont know if idx 6~8 are permanent lost or delayed. Permanently lost vs. delayed is an interesting point. Bumping GS does help us determine how long to wait in lease recovery. I agree we should bump GS when handling DN failures in write pipeline. > Erasure coding: Refactor DFSStripedOutputStream (Move Namenode RPC Requests > to Coordinator) > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-9040 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Sub-task > Reporter: Walter Su > Attachments: HDFS-9040-HDFS-7285.002.patch, > HDFS-9040-HDFS-7285.003.patch, HDFS-9040.00.patch, HDFS-9040.001.wip.patch, > HDFS-9040.02.bgstreamer.patch > > > The general idea is to simplify error handling logic. > Proposal 1: > A BlockGroupDataStreamer to communicate with NN to allocate/update block, and > StripedDataStreamer s only have to stream blocks to DNs. > Proposal 2: > See below the > [comment|https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-9040?focusedCommentId=14741388&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-14741388] > from [~jingzhao]. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.4#6332)