[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1850?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Eli Collins updated HDFS-1850:
------------------------------

    Attachment: hdfs-1850-7.patch

TestDatanodeBlockScanner passes for me in eclipse and when looped from the 
command line. I think this is related to an earlier change. The error message 
indicates we need to bump the number of attempts (ie it did see 1 corrupt 
replica after 20 attempts, but it also bails on the 20th attempt).

{quote}
java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Timed out waiting for corrupt replicas. 
Waiting for 1, but only found 1
{quote}

I'll bump the # attempts to 50 so we're more tolerant.

Updated patch attached. 

> DN should transmit absolute failed volume count rather than increments to the 
> NN
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-1850
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1850
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: data-node, name-node
>            Reporter: Eli Collins
>            Assignee: Eli Collins
>             Fix For: 0.22.0
>
>         Attachments: hdfs-1850-1.patch, hdfs-1850-2.patch, hdfs-1850-3.patch, 
> hdfs-1850-4.patch, hdfs-1850-5.patch, hdfs-1850-6.patch, hdfs-1850-7.patch
>
>
> The API added in HDFS-811 for the DN to report volume failures to the NN is 
> "inc(DN)". However the given sequence of events will result in the NN 
> forgetting about reported failed volumes:
> # DN loses a volume and reports it
> # NN restarts
> # DN re-registers to the new NN
> A more robust interface would be to have the DN report the total number of 
> volume failures to the NN each heart beat (the same way other volume state is 
> transmitted).
> This will likely be an incompatible change since it requires changing the 
> Datanode protocol.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to