[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-864?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16710361#comment-16710361
 ] 

Elek, Marton commented on HDDS-864:
-----------------------------------

Thanks the detailed review [~bharatviswa]

bq. We have not converted getS3Table()is this intentional or any reason for it 
to leave?

No exact reason. I started with converting only the key/volume/buckets table in 
the first phase. After a while I realized that I can't do it without converting 
a few additional tables (eg. open key). S3 table was independent. 

As this patch is big enough I propose to do it in a next (smaller) patch.

All the others will be part the next patch. Right now I am fixing the 
remaining, will be uploaded soon...

> Use strongly typed codec implementations for the tables of the 
> OmMetadataManager
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDDS-864
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDDS-864
>             Project: Hadoop Distributed Data Store
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: OM
>            Reporter: Elek, Marton
>            Assignee: Elek, Marton
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDDS-864.001.patch, HDDS-864.002.patch
>
>
> HDDS-748 provides a way to use higher level, strongly typed metadata Tables, 
> such as Table<String,OmKeyInfo> instead of Table<byte[],byte[]>
> HDDS-748 provides the new TypedTable in this jira I would fix the 
> OmMetadataManagerImpl to use the type-safe tables instead of the raw ones.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to