[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16742816#comment-16742816
 ] 

He Xiaoqiao commented on HDFS-14186:
------------------------------------

[~elgoiri] Thanks for your comments. sorry for missing something. just quick 
scan branch trunk again, IIUC #sendLifeline is lock free, and we can set a 
different port for the lifeline server, thus, DataNode may be not set DEAD when 
NameNode startup, but open lifeline feature is just effect after DataNode has 
registered successfully. As description above, if service port is overrun and 
some DataNode does not register successfully, lifeline could not fix it, FYI. 
Please correct me if there are something wrong.

> blockreport storm slow down namenode restart seriously in large cluster
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14186
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14186
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: He Xiaoqiao
>            Assignee: He Xiaoqiao
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14186.001.patch
>
>
> In the current implementation, the datanode sends blockreport immediately 
> after register to namenode successfully when restart, and the blockreport 
> storm will make namenode high load to process them. One result is some 
> received RPC have to skip because queue time is timeout. If some datanodes' 
> heartbeat RPC are continually skipped for long times (default is 
> heartbeatExpireInterval=630s) it will be set DEAD, then datanode has to 
> re-register and send blockreport again, aggravate blockreport storm and trap 
> in a vicious circle, and slow down (more than one hour and even more) 
> namenode startup seriously in a large (several thousands of datanodes) and 
> busy cluster especially. Although there are many work to optimize namenode 
> startup, the issue still exists. 
> I propose to postpone dead datanode check when namenode have finished startup.
> Any comments and suggestions are welcome.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to