[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14186?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16750247#comment-16750247
 ] 

Daryn Sharp commented on HDFS-14186:
------------------------------------

Kihwal asked me to take a look.  Safe mode logic has historically been very 
brittle so I worry about the unexpected consequences of changing the logic.  I 
think change is very simple.  

BR processing is serialized via queuing for the 
{{BlockManager.BlockReportProcessingThread}}.  The main issue is probably the 
{{enqueue}} method will block when the queue is full.  If the queue offer 
fails, it should throw a {{RetriableException}}.  This will prevent stalling 
the RPC handlers which leads to a vicious cycle of timeout/retries.

> blockreport storm slow down namenode restart seriously in large cluster
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14186
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14186
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: namenode
>            Reporter: He Xiaoqiao
>            Assignee: He Xiaoqiao
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14186.001.patch
>
>
> In the current implementation, the datanode sends blockreport immediately 
> after register to namenode successfully when restart, and the blockreport 
> storm will make namenode high load to process them. One result is some 
> received RPC have to skip because queue time is timeout. If some datanodes' 
> heartbeat RPC are continually skipped for long times (default is 
> heartbeatExpireInterval=630s) it will be set DEAD, then datanode has to 
> re-register and send blockreport again, aggravate blockreport storm and trap 
> in a vicious circle, and slow down (more than one hour and even more) 
> namenode startup seriously in a large (several thousands of datanodes) and 
> busy cluster especially. Although there are many work to optimize namenode 
> startup, the issue still exists. 
> I propose to postpone dead datanode check when namenode have finished startup.
> Any comments and suggestions are welcome.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to