[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14118?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16744572#comment-16744572
 ] 

Fengnan Li commented on HDFS-14118:
-----------------------------------

[~elgoiri] When I tried to write tests some new thoughts came to me: this 
change doesn't bring too much benefits for the normal HA setup since for every 
call from a client, there is a 50% chance it will go to the standby namenode 
first, and these traffic are totally waste of time and network resource. This 
is the downside of using DNS on an active-standby setup. (since standby is 
normal here)
However, if we limit the scope to just routers, it makes more sense since 
routers are all active-active, and none of the traffic is wasted. A client will 
have a low chance of hitting standby router. (since standby is abnormal here)
Please suggest and thanks very much.

> Use DNS to resolve Namenodes and Routers
> ----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-14118
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-14118
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: Fengnan Li
>            Assignee: Fengnan Li
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: HDFS-14118.patch
>
>
> Clients will need to know about routers to talk to the HDFS cluster 
> (obviously), and having routers updating (adding/removing) will have to make 
> every client change, which is a painful process.
> DNS can be used here to resolve the single domain name clients knows to a 
> list of routers in the current config. However, DNS won't be able to consider 
> only resolving to the working router based on certain health thresholds.
> There are some ways about how this can be solved. One way is to have a 
> separate script to regularly check the status of the router and update the 
> DNS records if a router fails the health thresholds. In this way, security 
> might be carefully considered for this way. Another way is to have the client 
> do the normal connecting/failover after they get the list of routers, which 
> requires the change of current failover proxy provider.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to