[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15209?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17053675#comment-17053675 ]
Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-15209: ---------------------------------- | (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* | \\ \\ || Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment || | {color:blue}0{color} | {color:blue} reexec {color} | {color:blue} 0m 0s{color} | {color:blue} Docker mode activated. {color} | | {color:red}-1{color} | {color:red} patch {color} | {color:red} 0m 7s{color} | {color:red} HDFS-15209 does not apply to trunk. Rebase required? Wrong Branch? See https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/HowToContribute for help. {color} | \\ \\ || Subsystem || Report/Notes || | JIRA Issue | HDFS-15209 | | JIRA Patch URL | https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12995818/fix_genstamp.patch | | Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/28908/console | | Powered by | Apache Yetus 0.8.0 http://yetus.apache.org | This message was automatically generated. > Lease recovery: namenode not able to commitBlockSynchronization if client > comes back and closes the file beforehand > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: HDFS-15209 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-15209 > Project: Hadoop HDFS > Issue Type: Bug > Components: namenode > Reporter: Ye Ni > Priority: Major > Attachments: fix_genstamp.patch > > > We observed a case, client closes the file after soft lease recovery already > started but before namenode commitBlockSynchronization. > This leads to commitBlockSynchronization failure with error below, which > requires either the file isn't closed or the last block isn't in complete > state. > As a result, we will have corrupted replicas by genstamp mismatch, since > datanodes may have finished block recovery with a new genstamp. > This could happen when client delays a lot on write and comes back when lease > recovery already happens by write/append/truncate request from other client. > Repro steps: > # Client #1 finishes writing a file, but hasn't closed yet. > # Client #1 doesn't renew lease for a soft lease period. > # Another client #2 appends the same file. > # Soft lease recovery begins. > # Block recovery in datanodes finishes. > # Client #1 comes back to close the file. > # Close succeeds since Client #1 still hold the lease (lease is revoked as > the last step in soft recovery). > # Namenode tries to commitBlockSynchronization with error log below. > # Namenode and datanodes have different genstamp for this file, resulting in > corrupted block. > Fix: > Check the state of the last block when completing the file. If it's under > recovery, it means lease recovery started, but namenode hasn't > commitBlockSynchronization yet. > In this case, don't complete file. > > {code:java} > 2020-02-22 22:47:04,698 INFO [IPC Server handler 32 on 8020] > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: > commitBlockSynchronization(oldBlock=BP-269461681-10.65.230.22-1554624547020:blk_2642650669_3063725879, > newgenerationstamp=3063765480, newlength=262144000, > newtargets=[25.65.180.47:10010, 25.65.161.162:10010, 100.101.88.162:10010], > closeFile=true, deleteBlock=false) > 2020-02-22 22:47:04,698 DEBUG [IPC Server handler 32 on 8020] > org.apache.hadoop.hdfs.server.namenode.FSNamesystem: Unexpected block > (=BP-269461681-10.65.230.22-1554624547020:blk_2642650669_3063725879) since > the file > (=132269111992796228.data.637180347427616457.tmp.132269136349107823.copying) > is not under construction > {code} > -- This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v8.3.4#803005) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org