[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17751684#comment-17751684
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on HDFS-17140:
---------------------------------------
slfan1989 commented on code in PR #5924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5924#discussion_r1285759414
##########
hadoop-hdfs-project/hadoop-hdfs/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/hdfs/server/datanode/BPOfferService.java:
##########
@@ -291,9 +291,8 @@ public String toString() {
void reportBadBlocks(ExtendedBlock block,
String storageUuid, StorageType storageType) {
checkBlock(block);
+ ReportBadBlockAction rbbAction = new ReportBadBlockAction(block,
storageUuid, storageType);
Review Comment:
Is it necessary to optimize this place? This could potentially cause issues,
for example, if we have seven namespaces [NS1~NS7] sharing a single object. If
we make changes to the ReportBadBlockAction in NS1, would it also affect the
other namespaces?
> Optimize the BPOfferService.reportBadBlocks() method
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-17140
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-17140
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: datanode
> Reporter: Liangjun He
> Assignee: Liangjun He
> Priority: Minor
> Labels: pull-request-available
>
> The current BPOfferService.reportBadBlocks() method can be optimized by
> moving the creation of the rbbAction object outside the loop.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: hdfs-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: hdfs-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
