[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13419953#comment-13419953
 ] 

Arun C Murthy commented on HDFS-3672:
-------------------------------------

Todd - the possibilities are intriguing. However, it still seems we have a lot 
of work ahead of us to realize the potential.

So, before we jump in and add new public apis, can you/Andrew provide a study 
or better, an prototype, which *proves* that this api would be actually useful 
in some way downstream?

Maybe we can look at some performance numbers if you have them? Or, maybe we 
can work on a branch where we have a clearly defined goal (say: improve HBase 
or improve MR scheduling) and we achieve that before we commit to this? 
                
> Expose disk-location information for blocks to enable better scheduling
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-3672
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-3672
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-alpha
>            Reporter: Andrew Wang
>            Assignee: Andrew Wang
>         Attachments: hdfs-3672-1.patch
>
>
> Currently, HDFS exposes on which datanodes a block resides, which allows 
> clients to make scheduling decisions for locality and load balancing. 
> Extending this to also expose on which disk on a datanode a block resides 
> would enable even better scheduling, on a per-disk rather than coarse 
> per-datanode basis.
> This API would likely look similar to Filesystem#getFileBlockLocations, but 
> also involve a series of RPCs to the responsible datanodes to determine disk 
> ids.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to