On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 14:39 +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote: > On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 02:29 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote: > > How correct is HAL? > > > > ...and have not believability ratings but correctness ratings, a la... > > > > Completely Incorrect > > Slighly Incorrect > > So So > > Slightly Correct > > Completely Correct > > > > [except presented horizontally] > > Wow, uh, seems like a good idea. Give me a day or two to digest it.
I'm confused. Why does your dissertation consider believability instead of correctness? What is the difference between believability and correctness? For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story. The stats are positive for Jack/Goal with Jill/Goal and Jill/NoGoal. Why not Jack/NoGoal with Jill/Goal? Since the story doesn't specify the individual goals, I don't think there is a correct answer but there are believable answers. Hence, I am inclined to leave the rating as a believability rating. Or am I missing something?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
