On Fri, 13 May 2005, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 14:39 +0530, Joshua N Pritikin wrote:On Fri, 2005-05-13 at 02:29 -0500, William L. Jarrold wrote:How correct is HAL?
...and have not believability ratings but correctness ratings, a la...
Completely Incorrect Slighly Incorrect So So Slightly Correct Completely Correct
[except presented horizontally]
Wow, uh, seems like a good idea. Give me a day or two to digest it.
I'm confused.
Why does your dissertation consider believability instead of correctness?
Why? see your answer below, I like the way you put it below. I think I may have had other reasons in the dissertation but they were prolly lamer.
What is the difference between believability and correctness?
For example, let's look at the Jack & Jill story. The stats are positive for Jack/Goal with Jill/Goal and Jill/NoGoal. Why not Jack/NoGoal with Jill/Goal? Since the story doesn't specify the individual goals, I don't think there is a correct answer but there are believable answers. Hence, I am inclined to leave the rating as a believability rating. Or am I missing something?
Nope, I am missing something.
Because of my error, I have decreased my OHL salary by 40%. My OHL salary is now $0.00/year.
Bill
_______________________________________________ Heartlogic-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/heartlogic-dev
