Check that; all entries in LC since 2012 have kim'at. From: Shinohara, Jasmin Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:58 PM To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel Subject: RE: [Heb-NACO] romanization of כמעט
I agree, but most of the entries in LC since 2012 have kim’at. Hence the question. From: Heb-naco [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yossi Galron Sent: Wednesday, June 29, 2016 5:53 PM To: Hebrew Name Authority Funnel Subject: Re: [Heb-NACO] romanization of כמעט So the question is: Should it be Ki-me'at, or Kime'at? I think it should be Ki-me'at - the entry in E.Sh. under מעט is much more elaborate then half the line under כמעט (The same is also in the מילון אריאל המקיף of 2007) Joseph (Yossi) Galron-Goldschläger E-Mail: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> or [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Tel.: (614) 292-3362, Fax: (614)292-1918 Lexicon of Modern Hebrew Literature: http://go.osu.edu/hebrewlit On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Shinohara, Jasmin <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: E-Sh. now has an entry for the word as itself, though it maintains a “see” reference to מעט. Do we consider this to be a changed Romanization? If so, I’ll add it to the chart on the wiki. Thanks, Jasmin --- Jasmin Shinohara Hebraica Cataloging Librarian University of Pennsylvania Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center 3420 Walnut Street Philadelphia, PA 19104-6206 T. 215-746-6397<tel:215-746-6397> F. 215-573-9610<tel:215-573-9610> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
_______________________________________________ Heb-naco mailing list [email protected] https://lists.osu.edu/mailman/listinfo/heb-naco
