On 24.8.2012 1:49, Adam Hraska wrote: > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Jakub Jermar <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 23.8.2012 9:56, Adam Hraska wrote: >>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:45 AM, Jakub Jermar <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Tonight, I did some testing and unfortunately it appears the branch is >>>> not that scrubbed or even tested as one would have hoped. These are the >>>> issues I noticed: >>>> >>>> - test cht panics the kernel when run on real amd64 or ia32 hardware >>>> (4-core Intel i5, 1.4GHz, 4G memory) >>>> - test cht panics the kernel when run on the above machine in QEMU (-smp >>>> 4 --enable-kvm) >>>> - unfortunately the panic message is interleaved with some other >>>> concurrent output so it is completely unreadable (some synchronization >>>> should be probably added back to printf) >>> >>> That is very unfortunate. While I expected there to be some latent >>> bugs in the implementation (as in any new software) I would not have >>> expected "test cht" would fail (eg leak memory) and definitely not to >>> panic. >>> >>> It is however quite difficult to respond to this point since I have no >>> idea what went wrong. >> >> I believe this is the same thing as the QEMU panic on UP. The same >> assertion is just hit by each CPU at about the same time, which would >> explain the blended panic message. > > Thanks. I will have a look at it on Sunday, when I get back to normal > computer & internet connection.
Has there been any progress on this front? I was expecting at least the major issues to be fixed rather soon. I would also like to submit further comments while the memory is still fresh... Jakub _______________________________________________ HelenOS-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.modry.cz/cgi-bin/listinfo/helenos-devel
