On Mon, 19 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote: > I'd like to see 2.2 out in January if we can, so I'd like to close > this file. Do we agree that: > > - we desire a warning about typed $n not used in the actions. A > simple macro that ignores its argument suffice to avoid the > complaints. > > - we desire that in all the skeletons no $n is ever freed from an > "active" rule, even if we leave it using YYACCEPT, YYERROR, or > YYABORT.
I agree. Do these rules also apply to implicit actions? That is, no user-specified action still means exactly {$$ = $1;}, and that may result in warnings about unused $n? For the sake of simplicity, this is my preference. Joel _______________________________________________ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison