On Wed, 21 Dec 2005, Akim Demaille wrote: > >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > These two patches are still pending in this area. > > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-12/msg00048.html > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-12/msg00049.html > > > The former is more important. I'd like Paul H.'s opinion on it, but > > if he's busy I guess we can check it in and then revert it if problems > > turn up. I will try to look at the latter in the next couple of days. > > I installed both.
Thanks. In one of these threads, I mentioned that the second patch breaks maintainer-check because I forgot to cast the return of malloc(). I'll submit another patch to fix this later. > They were still badly formatted by the way :) I'm clueless. I just tried exporting the second patch from the email I received back through the mailing list. I found that applying it perfectly reproduced my original code. However, I see that the CVS copy has a number of tabs from my original code converted to spaces. I'm guessing all of this also holds true for the first patch, but I haven't tried it. Could it be something wrong on your end? Did anyone else have a problem this time? If it's still me, does anyone have any clue what I could be doing wrong? Joel _______________________________________________ Help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison