El jue, 15-11-2007 a las 21:30 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió: > I will stick my neck out and say `YYLEX' is a macro, because I think I > was > overly cautious before. I don't know anything else it could be. > (Just my > opinion, but I loathe the term "method". Why they had to invent a new > word for "function" is beyond me.)
It's a macro that expands to yylex () or yylex ([some parameters]) depending on how the prototype for yylex is defined, and nothing else. So I think the crash happens inside whatever your yylex function is. If you are using flex, then you probably need to check how this function is defined in the flex generated code. Claudio -- Claudio Saavedra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ help-bison@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-bison
