On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:52:00 +0200 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:10 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> > wrote: > > As it turns out, I have fixed the bug which I found from this but it did not > > fix my gnutls problem (though it has made it easier to read the logs). I > > have uploaded the logs to avoid having a giant email message. They can be > > found here: > > I'll try to check it this evening. However does you problem persist > with the just released > gnutls 2.10.2? It has some fixes for asynchronous use. > > regards, > Nikos 2.10.2 fixes it! Excellent! Is there any way that this async fix can be backported to the 2.8 branch? A very large portion of the EFL's users rely on that branch and have not moved to 2.10 yet. -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge. _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
