On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:00:42 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:25:46 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz <[email protected]> > said: > > > On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:12:54 +0200 > > Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On 09/30/2010 09:32 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote: > > > > > > > 2.10.2 fixes it! Excellent! Is there any way that this async fix can be > > > > backported to the 2.8 branch? A very large portion of the EFL's users > > > > rely on that branch and have not moved to 2.10 yet. > > > > > > They are compatible so I think moving to 2.10 is pretty straight forward. > > > > > > regards, > > > Nikos > > Indeed, however on platforms such as mobile or embedded, only the 2.8 series > > may be available. > > there is nothing u can do if all u have is 2.8 - u are stuck. the binary is > already there. a backport would mean a rebuild and update/change of the > shipped 2.8... and that would mean you can just as well move to 2.10 anyway > with less work (is 2.10 doesnt break anything). > > Ah, I thought that they had just been staying on that series. Nevermind then! -- Mike Blumenkrantz Zentific: Our boolean values are huge. _______________________________________________ Help-gnutls mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gnutls
