At Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:15:01 -0700, Nicolas Bock wrote: > * Why did you decide to stick with C and not use C++ and its template > functionality? Wouldn't that have lead to a cleaner implementation?
C was the GNU standard language so it was not really a question of preference, just following the standard. If you have no other constraints, then C++ is preferable for templates. > * Was there a particular reason to implement the templates in the C > files with includes to other C files as opposed to in the makefile > with "-D..." preprocessor arguments? It was just a simple way that worked. _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
