-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thanks
On 02/18/11 04:42, Brian Gough wrote: > At Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:15:01 -0700, > Nicolas Bock wrote: >> * Why did you decide to stick with C and not use C++ and its template >> functionality? Wouldn't that have lead to a cleaner implementation? > > C was the GNU standard language so it was not really a question of > preference, just following the standard. > > If you have no other constraints, then C++ is preferable for templates. > >> * Was there a particular reason to implement the templates in the C >> files with includes to other C files as opposed to in the makefile >> with "-D..." preprocessor arguments? > > It was just a simple way that worked. > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk1ej3IACgkQf15tZKyRylJiNwCg7jzTPSeNs+IYxsjX+TMIq2G1 quoAoI/8MLTfthqy1+Iq4Hgbrg3KXzRI =zX// -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
