I use LAPACK almost exclusively for linear algebra problem, most notably for eigenvalue problems. GSL's linear algebra routines simply aren't ready for primetime, ie.e, they literally require orders of magnatude more CPU time that LAPACK.
I use LAPACK with Cygwin 1.7 Works wonderfully well. I've also built LAPACK+BLAS to work with MinGW. ---John On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Brian Gough <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > At Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:29:26 +0200, > Marco Maggi wrote: > > In general, is it maybe time to consider to rely on LAPACK > > now that they have made these changes to the C API? I still > > have to try the latest LAPACK, but from the README of > > "lapacke.tgz": > > > > This implementation introduces: > > > > - row-major and column-major matrix layout controlled by > > the first function parameter; > > > > Thanks for that, I hadn't seen the release announcement for the latest > lapack. It's a significant development and it should definitely be > possible to integrate GSL better with lapack now. > > > _______________________________________________ > Help-gsl mailing list > Help-gsl@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl > _______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list Help-gsl@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
