Try goupil it is better for this kind of stuff On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 6:59 PM, John Chludzinski <john.chludzin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I use LAPACK almost exclusively for linear algebra problem, most notably for > eigenvalue problems. GSL's linear algebra routines simply aren't ready for > primetime, ie.e, they literally require orders of magnatude more CPU time > that LAPACK. > > I use LAPACK with Cygwin 1.7 Works wonderfully well. I've also built > LAPACK+BLAS to work with MinGW. > > ---John > > On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Brian Gough <b...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> At Mon, 04 Jul 2011 10:29:26 +0200, >> Marco Maggi wrote: >> > In general, is it maybe time to consider to rely on LAPACK >> > now that they have made these changes to the C API? I still >> > have to try the latest LAPACK, but from the README of >> > "lapacke.tgz": >> > >> > This implementation introduces: >> > >> > - row-major and column-major matrix layout controlled by >> > the first function parameter; >> > >> >> Thanks for that, I hadn't seen the release announcement for the latest >> lapack. It's a significant development and it should definitely be >> possible to integrate GSL better with lapack now. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Help-gsl mailing list >> Help-gsl@gnu.org >> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl >> > _______________________________________________ > Help-gsl mailing list > Help-gsl@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl >
_______________________________________________ Help-gsl mailing list Help-gsl@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-gsl
