Hi,
I don't know the answer to your question and you are probably aware of that option, but I just wanted to mention that you could consider switching to mbsync, which (I think) also has better performance than offlineimap. It's a bit annoying to migrate the configuration, but it does not require that much time (I made that switch some time ago). Best, Dario Jorge P. de Morais Neto <jorge+l...@disroot.org> writes:
Hi. Em [2021-01-15 sex 18:07:40+0100], zimoun escreveu:As far as I know, Guix provides the security support that upstream releases.I too suppose so in general. But I would like a more authoritative answer for the specific case of Python2. And, in fact, this should be publicly documented---in the manual or in the website, as well as the description of the python2 package and maybe also in the description of all python2-.* packages.Using the Guix time-machine, the code that works now should work exactly the same in the future, even if Python 2 is removed in the future Guix releases. Does it make sense?The problem is that OfflineIMAP is Internet software, and therefore, I believe, it is important to have security support for it (including its dependencies). Regards
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
