On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 23:04, wolf <w...@wolfsden.cz> wrote: > I did not know Guix does not currently support the shell form. In that light > I > think it should not be implemented, since once your idea (arguments for entry > point) is implemented, it will be trivial for end-user to emulate it if so > desired.
That was my thinking too. > > One strange thing, I couldn't see the need for prefixing the profile > > to the ENTRYPOINT command: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/guix/scripts/pack.scm#n670 > > I took it out and everything seems to work, so I'm not sure what > > problem it is fixing. Anybody any idea? > > Wild guess, but it might depend on your container runtime (whether it uses > execv > or execvp). Absolute path feels somewhat more robust. Ah. I'll look into that, and not touch it just yet...
