Hi Wolf, On Thu, 1 Jun 2023 at 22:55, wolf <w...@wolfsden.cz> wrote: > > On 2023-05-31 18:47:03 +0100, Graham Addis wrote: > > I could use the equivalent format for --entry-point > > > > --entry-point executable --entry-point param1 --entry-point param2 > > > I think that is a reasonable idea. Only downside is that it would not be > backwards compatible (since currently last --entry-point wins), however I am > not > sure if someone actually relies on that behavior. > > Backwards compatible way would be keeping --entry-point as it is and > introducing > new argument (--entry-point-arg) that could be used to build the argument > list, > but I might be overthinking it :).
I'll go with extending --entry-point to accept multiple values and use all of them for --format=docker and simply use the last one provided for the other formats. I'll try to put a patch together at the weekend. Thanks for all your input, it really helps. Graham
