Richard Kreuter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I put in several similar paragraphs, and it seemed simplest and most > symmetric to require all binaries to be where the GNU coding standards > require, and have symlinks in other places. Should I remove the other > similar paragraphs?
The style of the FHS is to not mandate where the actual files are, but only that they can be found in certain places. So I think we should preserve that style. So say that things are "found here" or "there", using the same words as the main FHS does for these things. This is a standards document, not a guide for implementors. > > > The /com hierarchy should contain the following directories: > > > > > > /com/mail > > > /com/spool/news > > > <...what else?> > > > > This is not necessarily true. It is true only if those things can > > actually be shared, given the other software on the system. I would > > avoid putting any list here. > > Alright. I wanted to provide an example or two, since maybe people > aren't familiar with /com or what it's for. I'll remove the example > list. You can leave the list in, however, if you explain that it's conditional and not absolute. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
