Jeroen Dekkers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ok, the FSH is a unix standard, the difference doesn't really matter > for us.
No, the FHS is a filesystem standard for Posix and related systems. It is a perfectly appropriate sort of thing for GNU. > If you build a GNU system from scratch your filesystem hierarchy will > be as specified in the makefiles. So in fact the GNU Coding Standards > defines how your filesystem looks like. The FHS is useless if no > software actually implements it. No, and I wish instead of your knee-jerk responses you'd think for a bit. The GNU Coding Standards are *massively* underspecified, and say nothing about where a system integrator should install things. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
