On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:56:00PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Gerhard Muntingh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > That's not a reason to include an annex. The FHS specifies > > a consistent environment for POSIX software. It's should > > not contain OS specific contents (IMO). > > FHS has always had the attitude that it would have OS-specific > annexes. And here, we can take advantage of that. So we should.
Only for the things that are really needed, such as /hurd/ . You've convinced me now. > > It's just like GNU/Hurd patches for packages. It's the > > art to make them independend of platform, _not_ to add > > support for GNU/Hurd. > > Huh? Why shouldn't we do both, when appropriate? Yes, but there should be a big push for platform independend patches. I think the thread should end here, Gerhard. _______________________________________________ Help-hurd mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-hurd
