On 06/09/2011 11:05 AM, Gwenael Casaccio wrote:
I think that's the right way but I want your opinion on the changes. I plan to fix the multiple worlds support by : - fix the world swapping crash :) - see the impact on the vm (semaphore/events/...) - introducing a model for the worlds - the scheduling could be time shared for the worlds (Paolo what do you think)?
Why not parallel? M worlds == M threads, with inter-world synchronization primitives. Windows events look like a feasible model to use for synchronization primitives where you can wait for either any or all of N events to become signaled. Or Erlang-like channels too.
How do you plan to move objects across worlds? Paolo _______________________________________________ help-smalltalk mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-smalltalk
