Even though, I still strongly believe that there should be a "wait a minute and think about what you're doing here" prompt at the very least. Yes, it's not convenient, but neither is totaling a database because you got a bit frisky with your keyboard/muscle memory...
Neil On Sep 15, 5:41 pm, Pedro Belo <pe...@heroku.com> wrote: > Hey guys, > > The Heroku client gem lives here:http://github.com/heroku/heroku > > And yes, having multiple remotes on the same git repo forces you to be > explicit. In fact there are two ways to specify your app in this case, > informing --app or --remote (ie heroku rake db:migrate --remote > production). > > Thanks, > Pedro > > On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 6:24 AM, Sarah Allen <sa...@ultrasaurus.com> wrote: > > > It definitely makes the db commands explicit, like: > > heroku rake db:migrate --app myapp-production > > > Thanks for the pointer. I've written up a Pivotal Tracker chore and I > > look forward to trying out that configuration :) > > > On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:45 AM, Carl Fyffe wrote: > > >> Sarah, > > >> Here is an explanation of deploying to a production branch: > > >>http://jqr.github.com/2009/04/25/deploying-multiple-environments-on-h... > > >> Hope this helps! > > >> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Sarah Allen <sa...@ultrasaurus.com> > >> wrote: > > >>> I thought that Heroku needed the master branch. From the docs: > >>> "Branches pushed to Heroku other than “master” will be ignored. If > >>> you’re working out of another branch locally, you should either merge > >>> to master before pushing, or always specify the branch name to push > >>> to, as in “git push heroku master”. > >>>http://docs.heroku.com/git > > >>> I do like the idea of having a special production branch. It fits > >>> normal development practices that I've typically done for larger > >>> projects. I would prefer not to name it master, although I suppose > >>> we > >>> could move everyone to developing on "dev" or something. > > >>> On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:11 AM, Carl Fyffe wrote: > > >>>> I am not really a fan of the prompt idea. It seems cumbersome and > >>>> after you have done it 83 times it won't be protection, it will be > >>>> an > >>>> annoyance. Just look at Windows Vista's security. > > >>>> I *am* a fan of putting production on a different branch and > >>>> deploying > >>>> that. It is very similar to the force, but much more intentional. It > >>>> has the added bonus of being a good practice. > > >>>> I am sure there are downsides to doing it this way, but I don't see > >>>> them at the moment. > > >>>> On 9/15/09, Keenan Brock <kee...@thebrocks.net> wrote: > > >>>>> Oops > >>>>> Scratch previous point #1 > > >>>>> Hmm. That is odd - I searched for heroku on github and this didn't > >>>>> come up... > > >>>>> --Keenan > >>>>> On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:09 AM, Sarah Allen wrote: > > >>>>>> Yeah, I actually totally munged the live DB right after we went > >>>>>> live > >>>>>> (luckily before we told anyone about the site and we had all the > >>>>>> data > >>>>>> backed up). I agree that some kind of are-you-sure would be the > >>>>>> right > >>>>>> answer. Kind of like 'rm -i' but on by default -- there could be > >>>>>> a -f > >>>>>> option to suppress the warning. The gem is open source... I don't > >>>>>> know offhand how to add an interactive prompt to a rake task, > >>>>>> but I > >>>>>> suppose it could be added here: > >>>>>> http://github.com/heroku/heroku/blob/master/Rakefile > > >>>>>> I'm clearly not getting enough sleep this week, so for now I try > >>>>>> to be > >>>>>> quite cautious when I type heroku in particular directories, but > >>>>>> eventually I won't be able to live with that :) > > >>>>>> On Sep 15, 2009, at 1:45 AM, Neil wrote: > > >>>>>>> At the very least I would expect some sort of "This is a live > >>>>>>> environment - are you really, really sure you want to do this?" > >>>>>>> on > >>>>>>> the > >>>>>>> app changing actions. (db:push, db:reset etc, similar to destroy) > > >>>>>>> N > > >>>>>>> On Sep 11, 3:14 pm, Carl Anderson <nexus...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>>>>>>> That was something I was wondering as well. I've literally had > >>>>>>>> nightmares > >>>>>>>> about doing just that (am I alone?) > > >>>>>>>> Carl > > >>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Neil <neil.middle...@gmail.com> > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure if someone has already covered this, but although > >>>>>>>>> there > >>>>>>>>> are loads of really handy features in the Heroku gem, some of > >>>>>>>>> the > >>>>>>>>> functions that you can acheive are potentially very damaging > >>>>>>>>> to a > >>>>>>>>> production environment and also very easy to do. > > >>>>>>>>> For instance, from what I've seen there is nothing to stop me > >>>>>>>>> from > >>>>>>>>> doing a db:push to my live application - there's no sort of > >>>>>>>>> question > >>>>>>>>> of confirmation etc. > > >>>>>>>>> Is this something that's planned or is it something I've just > >>>>>>>>> not > >>>>>>>>> seen? > > >>>>>>http://www.ultrasaurus.com > > >>>http://www.ultrasaurus.com > > >http://www.ultrasaurus.com > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Heroku" group. To post to this group, send email to heroku@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to heroku+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/heroku?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
