Sounds good to me! :) On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 8:19 AM Sanne Grinovero <sa...@hibernate.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2019 at 14:00, Steve Ebersole <st...@hibernate.org> wrote: > > > > Guillaume - I added a general start-a-discussion comment to the PR. > Hopefully anyone with an opinion on that can chime in there. Beyond that, > +1 > > > > > > Sanne - ok, I see. You are not expecting users to have to deal with > wrapping/scrolling because you limit the presented information to an > arbitrary set of values. That's certainly an option. My only caution > there is that this is an arbitrary list of values-of-interest. > > > > We all agree version is important. It is beyond that that we start to > have different preferences. I think everything beyond that is DEBUG-level > info. For any additional values, I worry about the arbitrary nature of > what we present and don't in this message. I mean to me, the same argument > that leads to "caching enabled/disabled" being important enough to list > also dictates that CDI integration is important enough too. Same for > BytecodeProvider, ConnectionProvider, ... Its this question of where we > draw the line that concerns me. And if we are drawing an arbitrary line, > why are we drawing that line at all? > > Yeah it's arbitrary. When I proposed it I thought with some luck we > might have a quick consensus; if not let's just stick to the version. > > > I'll eagerly await your discussion about enabling caching by default ;) > > Let's face that in front of some great food in Rome :) > _______________________________________________ hibernate-dev mailing list hibernate-dev@lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hibernate-dev