Yes, you're misunderstanding. If I say lazy="false", it should *always* be eager fetched.
There's nothing wrong with fetch="join" lazy="true" if you want flexibility. -----Original Message----- From: Max Andersen Sent: Monday, 2 May 2005 5:48 PM To: Gavin King; Christian Bauer; hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hibernate] New laziness rules >> Note that the association-level lazy setting is now *completely >> respected*. if I run a HQL query and some of the objects in the result > >> set have non-lazy associations, those associations will be >> *immediately fetched*. This one I don't get why we want that ? I actually saw it as a strength that you via the HQL language could override what the static mapping specified....or am i misunderstanding this ? -- -- Max Rydahl Andersen callto://max.rydahl.andersen Hibernate [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://hibernate.org JBoss Inc [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jboss.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r _______________________________________________ hibernate-devel mailing list hibernate-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hibernate-devel
