Hello,
Am 14.09.2012 10:18, schrieb Miika Komu:
Hi,
On 09/13/2012 03:04 PM, Miika Komu wrote:
Hi,
On 09/13/2012 11:11 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Folks,
I would like to start the WGLCs on the following two drafts. These
WGLCs
will end on September 30th.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/
In addition to technical comments, please also let the list know
whether
you still care about these specifications. Given the low level of
energy
in the WG, one of the issues the IESG will evaluate will be whether
there is still enough interest behind all these bis documents.
Please, send your comments to this mailing list.
I do care and I should have now time to comment.
besides me, there's also some other people who could help in the final
push if we'd know more specifically what to do. Could somebody re-post
what to comment or to check from the drafts?
I think it would be good to check the general big-picture and how all
parts play together. When redesigning the BEX and changing the HIT, we
were careful to still maintain the properties of HIP. However, I think
it woulr be best to have a close look at the general protocol mechanics
to make sure that all parts are still in place. For 5201-bis, we have
had some extensive reviews during the writing phase about a year ago.
These reviews were generally very positive and the improvements that we
have made to the text seem to add clarity. Since then only detail
changes have been made. So I am quite confident that the WGLC reviews
will go well.
If we need more complete reviews, we could split the work if there's
volunteers?
More and better reviews are always a good thing ;-)
Tobias
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
