Hi, in particular, please provide input on whether 4423-bis, which does not have normative language, should be (eventually) published as a PS or an Informational RFC.
Cheers, Gonzalo On 13/09/2012 11:11 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Folks, > > I would like to start the WGLCs on the following two drafts. These WGLCs > will end on September 30th. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/ > > In addition to technical comments, please also let the list know whether > you still care about these specifications. Given the low level of energy > in the WG, one of the issues the IESG will evaluate will be whether > there is still enough interest behind all these bis documents. > > Please, send your comments to this mailing list. > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > HIP WG co-chair > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
