Am 20.10.2012 17:04 schrieb "Miika Komu" <mkomu <[email protected]>@<[email protected]> cs.hut.fi <[email protected]>>: > > Hi, > > > On 10/20/2012 01:28 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: >>> >>> >>> Since parsing and formatting code for both is pretty much ubiquitous >>> and the packet space is dominated by the key itself, I see no real >>> reason to change. That DNSKEY is supposed only to be used for DNSSEC >>> is a distraction, we have our own RR and reusing the wire format is >>> merely a convenience. >> >> >> +1 > > > fine by me as well.
I agree. +1. Tobias > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > Hipsec <[email protected]>@ <[email protected]>ietf.org <[email protected]> > https > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>://<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec> www.ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>/<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec> mailman <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>/<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec> listinfo <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>/<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec> hipsec <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec> I
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
