On Oct 21, 2012, at 12:21 AM, Tobias Heer wrote: > > Am 20.10.2012 17:04 schrieb "Miika Komu" <[email protected]>: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 10/20/2012 01:28 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> Since parsing and formatting code for both is pretty much ubiquitous > >>> and the packet space is dominated by the key itself, I see no real > >>> reason to change. That DNSKEY is supposed only to be used for DNSSEC > >>> is a distraction, we have our own RR and reusing the wire format is > >>> merely a convenience. > >> > >> > >> +1 > > > > > > fine by me as well. > > I agree. +1. >
A bit slow reply but yes +1 from us as well. Cheers, Jan
_______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
