Hi, yes, I talked with Miika a dew days ago and I was under the impression that Julien was going to revise the draft once more before it was ready for be to take it.
Julien, can you confirm *this* is the version you want me to pub req? Thanks, Gonzalo On 21/02/2014 12:10 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: > Gonzalo, > Are there any other issues left to resolve on these drafts or can you make > the publication request? I believe that the open issues identified below > have all been closed. > > - Tom > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo >> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:24 AM >> To: HIP >> Subject: [Hipsec] Status update on the four core drafts: 4423bis, >> 4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis >> >> Folks, >> >> here you have a status update on the four core drafts. Note that at >> this point only one of them is ready for publication request. Authors >> and editors, please put some energy into this so that we can send them >> to our AD shortly. >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ >> >> This draft needs to be revised. The last version expired in April: >> >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-05.txt >> >> We agreed that this draft will be Informational (the current version >> still says PS). >> >> Given the slow progress of this draft, we will not be blocking the >> other three drafts on this one. Nevertheless, we need to make some >> progress with this one as well. >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis/ >> >> This draft, which expires in a week, needs to be revised to fix a few >> nits. I am hoping that a new revision of this draft will be ready for >> publication request. >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/ >> >> This revision seems to be ready for publication request. We will >> request the publication of the three drafts (4843bis, 5201bis, and >> 5202bis) together, though. >> >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis/ >> >> We need to add CMAC and GMAC to 5202-bis to provide a modern null >> cipher. We are waiting for text from Bob. >> >> Also, I still have not received a confirmation from all authors that >> they do not know any additional IPR on the draft. I hope to get it >> shortly. >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Gonzalo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Hipsec mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
