Hi Gonzalo, Yes this version (i.e., draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis-05.txt) is ready for publication request.
Thanks, --julien On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > yes, I talked with Miika a dew days ago and I was under the impression > that Julien was going to revise the draft once more before it was ready > for be to take it. > > Julien, can you confirm *this* is the version you want me to pub req? > > Thanks, > > Gonzalo > > On 21/02/2014 12:10 AM, Henderson, Thomas R wrote: >> Gonzalo, >> Are there any other issues left to resolve on these drafts or can you make >> the publication request? I believe that the open issues identified below >> have all been closed. >> >> - Tom >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of Gonzalo Camarillo >>> Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:24 AM >>> To: HIP >>> Subject: [Hipsec] Status update on the four core drafts: 4423bis, >>> 4843bis, 5201bis, and 5202bis >>> >>> Folks, >>> >>> here you have a status update on the four core drafts. Note that at >>> this point only one of them is ready for publication request. Authors >>> and editors, please put some energy into this so that we can send them >>> to our AD shortly. >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis/ >>> >>> This draft needs to be revised. The last version expired in April: >>> >>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4423-bis-05.txt >>> >>> We agreed that this draft will be Informational (the current version >>> still says PS). >>> >>> Given the slow progress of this draft, we will not be blocking the >>> other three drafts on this one. Nevertheless, we need to make some >>> progress with this one as well. >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc4843-bis/ >>> >>> This draft, which expires in a week, needs to be revised to fix a few >>> nits. I am hoping that a new revision of this draft will be ready for >>> publication request. >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5201-bis/ >>> >>> This revision seems to be ready for publication request. We will >>> request the publication of the three drafts (4843bis, 5201bis, and >>> 5202bis) together, though. >>> >>> >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5202-bis/ >>> >>> We need to add CMAC and GMAC to 5202-bis to provide a modern null >>> cipher. We are waiting for text from Bob. >>> >>> Also, I still have not received a confirmation from all authors that >>> they do not know any additional IPR on the draft. I hope to get it >>> shortly. >>> >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Gonzalo >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Hipsec mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
