On 09/04/2014 12:48 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Hiya,
On 04/09/14 05:56, Tom Henderson wrote:
How could we move this issue forward? Stephen, would you advocate
putting in 2048-bit and 4096-bit groups (perhaps with values 11 and 12
respectively)?
I would advocate putting in the 2048 bit group yes. I figure
you probably don't need the 4096 one on the basis that before
one would go there you'd want to switch to some form of ECC.
So I'd not argue to define a codepoint for the 4096 bit group
for now myself, but equally, I'd not argue against doing so.
I'm fine with that (adding the 2048 bit group). I propose to add it as
"value 11" in the list. I'll wait a few days for concurrence or lazy
consensus before making the change, however.
- Tom
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec