Hi Tom (Henderson), Jari, Brian, and Ted still have discusses on this document. Could you please summarize for each of them the status of this draft with respect to their particular comments?
Thanks, Gonzalo On 07/09/2014 2:17 PM, Tom Taylor wrote: > I'm happy with the outcome. The list discussion addressed the issue. I > believe the outcome is: "The plaintext attack is resistible, not a real > problem, and need not be addressed in the document." > > Tom Taylor > > On 06/09/2014 11:37 AM, Tom Henderson wrote: >> On 09/06/2014 08:25 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: >>> It looks like the latest rev of 5201-bis does not address the gen-art >>> review comments nor Francis Dupont's comments, and I haven't seen any >>> follow-up discussion on Francis' comments. What do the authors >>> believe the status of these two comment threads is? >>> >> >> Ted, >> >> I believe that there is only one open issue left from the Gen-Art >> review, regarding possible plaintext attacks: >> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/42 >> >> The list discussion on this issue leans against making any change; see >> the last message of this thread: >> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03903.html >> >> I think I previously handled all of the other comments; if I missed any, >> please point them out. >> >> I have tried to contact Francis a couple of times regarding >> clarification of his comments and have not seen a reply. This is >> tracked in issue: >> >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/49 >> >> I'm cc'ing both Tom Taylor and Francis for any further clarifications. >> >> - Tom >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Hipsec mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec > _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
