Hi,
On 09/16/2014 08:20 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
On 09/15/2014 04:37 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
Hi Tom (Henderson),
Jari, Brian, and Ted still have discusses on this document. Could you
please summarize for each of them the status of this draft with respect
to their particular comments?
Thanks,
Gonzalo
Gonzalo, the most recent status on this draft was posted to the HIP list
in this message:
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03942.html
Since then, it seems that Jari and Brian have cleared their discusses.
I believe that the IANA issues have been mostly resolved (Ted's
discuss). Ted's discuss was against version -14 of the draft, while we
are at version -17 now. There is a lingering comment that I haven't
picked up from Barry (item 5 in the above email) that pertains to IANA
text; I plan to publish those in version -18.
I could probably put out a version -18 shortly that may resolve all of
the open issues, but it just requires that I generate a new Appendix C
example packet. I'll try to get to that in the next day or two.
I wrote a checksum generator, and I have independently verified that the
checksums in RFC5201-bis are correct.
_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
