Hi Spencer, thanks for your comments, please see my response below.
ke, 2018-05-09 kello 18:18 -0700, Spencer Dawkins kirjoitti: > Spencer Dawkins has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal-28: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut > this > introductory paragraph, however.) > > > Please refer to > https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html > for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. > > > The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-native-nat-traversal/ > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > COMMENT: > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > > I'm balloting No Objection, but I'm watching the discussion in Eric's > ballot > thread about reusing pieces of ICE, and I look forward to some > discussion about > the provisions being made for middleboxes in this draft - I'm not > denying that > such things exist, only that it would be best if we understood why > middleboxes > are needed for this usage. I am not sure exactly what you mean by middlebox provisioning, but at least a couple of things have been clarified in the draft related to middleboxes: * STUN may be used for discovering address candidates; HIP Control Servers are recommended * The address candidates are encrypted to protect against middlebox tampering _______________________________________________ Hipsec mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
