While I prefer to go by my own name, I recognize that some people rightly fear to do so. An anonymous source may still have something worthwhile to say. Experience does not always teach well. The wise and experienced Linus Pauling and Erwin Chargaff were wrong about the structure of DNA; the brash young James Watson was right. -Allen A. Smith Professor of Anatomy School of Podiatric Medicine Barry University Miami Shores, FL
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kiernan Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 3:18 PM To: Amber McKenzie Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: Re: [Histonet] Alias identity Amber McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . . .We are all supposed to be professionals asking each other for > advice/suggestions on the Histonet - who cares who each person is? If > I post a question, I don't care if it's Jane Doe answering or John > Smith ... That's true, and it certainly makes no difference if the person asking a question hides behind an alias. But what about the person answering? Can you act upon advice from an unknown source? Jane Doe might be experienced and wise, whereas John Smith might be some pimply youth who only thinks he knows all the answers. John Kiernan Anatomy, UWO London, Canada = = = _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet