And neither Watson nor Crick even mentioned her in their Nobel acceptance speech when she was the one who showed them the route and "enlightened" their minds. René J.
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, Rivka Rachel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Rivka Rachel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Alias identity To: "Smith, Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, December 9, 2008, 9:23 AM Rosalind Franklin was wise and experienced because she was a genius who started her scientific career at the age of 21. By the time she passed away at the age of 37, she had made significant contributions in many more fields than Watson ever did. For more information, see http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/aso/databank/entries/bofran.html. On 12/9/08 9:06 AM, "Smith, Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The wise and experienced Rosalind Franklin also had the structure wrong. > > From: Rene J Buesa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 8:19 AM > To: 'John Kiernan'; Smith, Allen > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: [Histonet] Alias identity > > Barry: > Are you not forgetting about Rosalind Franklin? > René J. > > --- On Mon, 12/8/08, Smith, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Smith, Allen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: [Histonet] Alias identity > To: "'John Kiernan'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "'[email protected]'" <[email protected]> > Date: Monday, December 8, 2008, 6:43 PM > > While I prefer to go by my own name, I recognize that some people rightly fear > > to do so. An anonymous source may still have something worthwhile to say. > > Experience does not always teach well. The wise and experienced Linus Pauling > > and Erwin Chargaff were wrong about the structure of DNA; the brash young > James > > Watson was right. > > -Allen A. Smith > > Professor of Anatomy > > School of Podiatric Medicine > > Barry University > > Miami Shores, FL > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Kiernan > > Sent: Monday, December 08, 2008 3:18 PM > > To: Amber McKenzie > > Cc: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Histonet] Alias identity > > > > Amber McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> . . .We are all supposed to be professionals asking each other for > >> advice/suggestions on the Histonet - who cares who each person is? If > >> I post a question, I don't care if it's Jane Doe answering or John > >> Smith ... > > > > That's true, and it certainly makes no difference if the person asking a > > question hides behind an alias. But what about the person answering? Can you > act > > upon advice from an unknown source? Jane Doe might be experienced and wise, > > whereas John Smith might be some pimply youth who only thinks he knows all the > > answers. > > > > John Kiernan > > Anatomy, UWO > > London, Canada > > = = = > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Histonet mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet > > > _______________________________________________ > Histonet mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet -- Rivka A. Rachel, MD, PhD Staff Scientist, National Eye Institute Neurobiology, Neurodegeneration & Repair Laboratory Bldg 10 Rm 10D43 Tel: 301 443-4906 _______________________________________________ Histonet mailing list [email protected] http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/listinfo/histonet
